2013-04-11                     Senate Journal                      Page 1123
SB 52                                                                                                                         
Message dated April 10 was read stating the House passed and                                                                    
returned for consideration CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 52(L&C) "An                                                                   
Act providing that portable electronics insurance is not a service                                                              
contract; providing that a portable electronics manufacturer's warranty                                                         
or extended warranty is not regulated as insurance; relating to portable                                                        
electronics insurance; authorizing the director of insurance to issue a                                                         
limited producer license to a portable electronics vendor for the sale of                                                       
portable electronics insurance; and relating to authorization and                                                               
training of employees and representatives of a vendor to transact                                                               
portable electronics insurance; and providing for an effective date"                                                            
with the following amendment:                                                                                                   
                                                                                                                                
                       HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL                                                                         
          NO. 52(L&C)                                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Senator Coghill moved that the Senate concur in the House                                                                       
amendment.                                                                                                                      
                                                                                                                                
The question being: "Shall the Senate concur in the House                                                                       
amendment?" The roll was taken with the following result:                                                                       
                                                                                                                                
HCS CSSB 52(L&C)                                                                                                                
Shall the Senate Concur in the House                                                                                            
Amendment to CSSB 52(L&C)?                                                                                                      
Effective Date                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
YEAS:  19   NAYS:  0   EXCUSED:  0   ABSENT:  1                                                                               
                                                                                                                                
                                                                                                                                

2013-04-11                     Senate Journal                      Page 1124
Yeas:  Bishop, Coghill, Dunleavy, Dyson, Egan, Ellis, Fairclough,                                                               
French, Gardner, Giessel, Hoffman, Huggins, McGuire, Meyer,                                                                     
Micciche, Olson, Stedman, Stevens, Wielechowski                                                                                 
                                                                                                                                
Absent:  Kelly                                                                                                                  
                                                                                                                                
and so, the Senate concurred in the House amendment, thus adopting                                                              
HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 52(L&C) "An Act                                                                             
providing that portable electronics insurance is not a service contract;                                                        
providing that a portable electronics manufacturer's warranty or                                                                
extended warranty is not regulated as insurance; relating to portable                                                           
electronics insurance; authorizing the director of insurance to issue a                                                         
limited producer license to a portable electronics vendor for the sale of                                                       
portable electronics insurance; and relating to authorization and                                                               
training of employees and representatives of a vendor to transact                                                               
portable electronics insurance; and providing for an effective date."                                                           
                                                                                                                                
Senator Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the vote on                                                              
concurrence be considered the vote on the effective date clause.                                                                
Without objection, it was so ordered.                                                                                           
                                                                                                                                
The Secretary was requested to notify the House.                                                                                
                                                                                                                                
The bill was referred to the Secretary for enrollment.